No-one noticed, but last month's Swallow had a deliberate mistake.
None of the articles had any of the cheeky little hyperlinks in the body of the text. You know the ones. The ones that so amused all thirty readers of Swallow #1 that they couldn't see clearly enough through their tears of laughter to email me about it.
Why was this? What do you think?
There will be a prize for the first correct answer received by 20th May 1997, consisting of an invitation to contribute to Swallow #4.
Second prize will be the offer of a regular column. NB - there is another deliberate mistake hidden cleverly somewhere in this month's edition. Can you find it?
(Easily the worst editorial yet. Where to go from here?)
virtual vanity
The Internet Will Save The World #3
DIY Culture by hopeless idealist